Introduction
Neurosurgery is considered the mainstay of treatment for pediatric low-grade glioma (LGG); the extent of resection determines subsequent stratification in current treatment protocols. Yet, surgical radicality must be balanced against the risks of complications that may affect long-term quality of life. We investigated whether this consideration impacted surgical resection patterns over time for patients of the German LGG studies.
Patients and Methods
Four thousand two hundred and seventy pediatric patients from three successive LGG studies (median age at diagnosis 7.6 years, neurofibromatosis (NF1) 14.7%) were grouped into 5 consecutive time intervals (TI1-5) for date of diagnosis and analyzed for timing and extent of first surgery with respect to tumor site, histology, NF1-status, sex, and age.
Results
The fraction of radiological LGG diagnoses increased over time (TI1 12.6%; TI5 21.7%), while the extent of the first neurosurgical intervention (3440/4270) showed a reduced fraction of complete/subtotal and an increase of partial resections from TI1 to TI5. Binary logistic regression analysis for the first intervention within the first year following diagnosis confirmed the temporal trends (p < 0.001) and the link with tumor site for each extent of resection (p < 0.001). Higher age is related to more complete resections in the cerebellum and cerebral hemispheres.
Conclusions
The declining extent of surgical resections over time was unrelated to patient characteristics. It paralleled the evolution of comprehensive treatment algorithms; thus, it may reflect alignment of surgical practice to recommendations in respect to age, tumor site, and NF1-status integrated as such into current treatment guidelines. Further investigations are needed to understand how planning, performance, or tumor characteristics impact achieving surgical goals.
LGG-14. Pediatric diffuse glioma WHO-GRADE II: prognostic impact of molecular genetic variants
(2018)
BACKGROUND
Understanding the long-term cognitive sequelae in infant brain tumor survivors remains incomplete, particularly regarding the impact of tumor type, multimodal treatment, and other patient-related factors. This retrospective analysis explores neuropsychological and quality of survival (QoS) outcomes in survivors of atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors (AT/RT) and extracranial malignant rhabdoid tumors of soft tissues (eMRT) and kidneys (RTK), all treated within the same framework. Neuropsychological data from children with AT/RT were compared to data from children with non-irradiated low-grade glioma (LGG).
METHODS
Patients (0 - 36 months at diagnosis) underwent various treatments, including radio-chemotherapy for AT/RT (n = 13) and eMRT/RTK (n = 7), chemotherapy only for LGG (n = 4) and eMRT/RTK (n = 1), or observation for LGG (n = 11). Neuropsychological evaluations were conducted at a median of 6.8 years (AT/RT), 6.6 years (eMRT/RTK), and 5.2 years (LGG) post-diagnosis.
RESULTS
Impairments were observed for all tumour types. Patients with AT/RT exhibited impairments in fluid intelligence (p =.041; d = 1.11) and visual processing (p =.001; d = 2.09) when compared to LGG-patients. Both groups demonstrated deficits in psychomotor speed and attention abilities (p <.001–.019; d = 0.79–1.90). Diagnosis significantly predicted cognitive outcomes, whereas gender and age-related variables did not. QoS outcomes for all rhabdoid patients indicated lower scores in psychosocial functioning (p =.023; d = 0.78) and quality of life (p =.006; d = 0.79) compared to healthy controls.
CONCLUSIONS
Infant rhabdoid tumor survivors experience cognitive and quality-of-life sequelae. Patients with AT/RT are especially vulnerable to impairments in fluid intelligence and visual processing, while infant LGG-patients without radiotherapy demonstrated comparable deficits in psychomotor and attention abilities. Close monitoring of neuropsychological and quality of life outcomes is crucial for early onset and multimodal treatment.