• Deutsch
Login

Open Access

  • Home
  • Search
  • Browse
  • Publish/report a document
  • Help

Refine

Has Fulltext

  • yes (2)

Author

  • Bauer, Dominik (2)
  • Hasford, Joerg (2)
  • Mannell, Hanna (2)
  • Schönermarck, Ulf (2)
  • Seiberth, Sarah (2)
  • Stief, Christian (2)
  • Strobach, Dorothea (2)

Year of publication

  • 2021 (1)
  • 2020 (1)

Document Type

  • Article (2)

Language

  • English (2)

Keywords

  • Pharmacology (2)
  • Pharmacology (medical) (2)
  • General Medicine (1)

Institute

  • Lehrstuhl für Physiologie (2)
  • Medizinische Fakultät (2)

2 search hits

  • 1 to 2
  • 10
  • 20
  • 50
  • 100

Sort by

  • Year
  • Year
  • Title
  • Title
  • Author
  • Author
Correct use of non-indexed eGFR for drug dosing and renal drug-related problems at hospital admission (2020)
Seiberth, Sarah ; Bauer, Dominik ; Schönermarck, Ulf ; Mannell, Hanna ; Stief, Christian ; Hasford, Joerg ; Strobach, Dorothea
Purpose Two to seven percent of the German adult population has a renal impairment (RI) with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 ml/min/1.73m2. This often remains unrecognized and adjustment of drug therapy is lacking. To determine renal function in clinical routine, the CKD-EPI equation is used to calculate an indexed eGFR (ml/min/1.73m2). For drug dosing, it has to be individualized to a non-indexed eGFR (ml/min) by the patient’s body surface area. Here, we investigated the number of patients admitted to urological wards of a teaching hospital with RI between July and December 2016. Additionally, we correctly used the eGFRnon-indexed for drug and dosage adjustments and to analyse the use of renal risk drugs (RRD) and renal drug-related problems (rDRP). Methods In a retrospective observational study, urological patients with pharmacist-led medication reconciliation at hospital admission and eGFRindexed (CKD-EPI) of 15–59 ml/min/1.73m2 were identified. Indexed eGFR (ml/min/1.73m2) was recalculated with body surface area to non-indexed eGFR (ml/min) for correct drug dosing. Medication at admission was reviewed for RRD and based on the eGFRnon-indexed for rDRP, e.g. inappropriate dose or contraindication. Results Of 1320 screened patients, 270 (20.5%) presented with an eGFRindexed of 15–59 ml/min/1.73m2. After readjustment, 203 (15.4%) patients had an eGFRnon-indexed of 15–59 ml/min. Of these, 190 (93.6%) used ≥ 1 drugs at admission with 660 of 1209 (54.7%) drugs classified as RRD. At least one rDRP was identified in 115 (60.5%) patients concerning 264 (21.8%) drugs. Conclusion Renal impairment is a common risk factor for medication safety in urologic patients admitted to a hospital. Considerable shifts were seen in eGFR-categories when correctly calculating eGFRnon-indexed for drug dosing purposes. The fact that more than half of the study patients showed rDRP at hospital admission underlines the need to consider this risk factor appropriately.
Implementation of a renal pharmacist consultant service: information sharing in paper versus digital form (2021)
Seiberth, Sarah ; Bauer, Dominik ; Schönermarck, Ulf ; Mannell, Hanna ; Stief, Christian ; Hasford, Joerg ; Strobach, Dorothea
What is known and objective Renal impairment (RI) and renal drug-related problems (rDRP) often remain unrecognized in the community setting. A “renal pharmacist consultant service” (RPCS) at hospital admission can support patient safety by detecting rDRP. However, the efficient information sharing from pharmacists to physicians is still discussed. The aim of the study was to test the implementation of a RPCS and its effectiveness on prescription changes and to evaluate two ways of written information sharing with physicians. Methods Urological patients with eGFRnon-indexed of 15-59 ml/min and ≥1 drug were reviewed for manifest and potential rDRP at admission by a pharmacist. Written recommendations for dose or drug adaptation were forwarded to physicians comparing two routes: July-September 2017 paper form in handwritten chart; November 2017-January 2018 digital PDF document in the electronic patient information system and e-mail alert. Prescription changes regarding manifest rDRP were evaluated and compared with a previous retrospective study without RPCS. Results and discussion The RPCS detected rDRP in 63 of 234 (26.9%) patients and prepared written recommendations (median 1 rDRP (1-5) per patient) concerning 110 of 538 (20.5%) drugs at admission. For manifest rDRP, acceptance rates of recommendations were 62.5% (paper) vs 42.9% (digital) (P = 0.16). Compared with the retrospective study without RPCS (prescription changes in 21/76 rDRP; 27.6%), correct prescribing concerning manifest rDRP significantly increased by 27.1%. What is new and conclusion A RPCS identifies patients at risk for rDRP and significantly increases appropriate prescribing by physicians. In our hospital (no electronic order entry, electronic chart or ward pharmacists), consultations in paper form seem to be superior to a digital PDF document.
  • 1 to 2

OPUS4 Logo

  • Contact
  • Imprint
  • Sitelinks