• search hit 3 of 2180
Back to Result List

Beyond sorting: using sensor-based sorter data for real-time throughput and composition monitoring

  • Modern sorting plants for lightweight packaging waste (mainly plastics, metals and compounds) can operate with up to 50 sensor-based sorters (SBS), generating large volumes of material flow data. This study presents the first systematic evaluation of SBS data for real-time, inline monitoring of throughput (0.1–17.5 t/h) and input composition (eject shares 5–50%). Two fractions were examined: larger polyethylene “chips” sorted by color via visible light (VIS) cameras, and smaller “flakes” of various polymers sorted by near-infrared (NIR) technology. Formulas converting pixel counts to mass-based metrics were developed, while artificial intelligence was deliberately avoided to highlight the inherent potential of pixel data. Monitoring accuracy depended strongly on particle overlap, measured by the superposition factor (fsp). For fsp<1.05, median throughput deviations were +0.3% (chips) and −11.6% (flakes); composition deviations were +3.9% and +2.4%, respectively. If the outlinedModern sorting plants for lightweight packaging waste (mainly plastics, metals and compounds) can operate with up to 50 sensor-based sorters (SBS), generating large volumes of material flow data. This study presents the first systematic evaluation of SBS data for real-time, inline monitoring of throughput (0.1–17.5 t/h) and input composition (eject shares 5–50%). Two fractions were examined: larger polyethylene “chips” sorted by color via visible light (VIS) cameras, and smaller “flakes” of various polymers sorted by near-infrared (NIR) technology. Formulas converting pixel counts to mass-based metrics were developed, while artificial intelligence was deliberately avoided to highlight the inherent potential of pixel data. Monitoring accuracy depended strongly on particle overlap, measured by the superposition factor (fsp). For fsp<1.05, median throughput deviations were +0.3% (chips) and −11.6% (flakes); composition deviations were +3.9% and +2.4%, respectively. If the outlined challenges are considered, the technology can be used in realistic conditions of plant operation (fsp<1.25).show moreshow less

Download full text files

Export metadata

Statistics

Number of document requests

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar
Metadaten
Author:Sabine Schlögl, Bastian Küppers, Daniel VollprechtORCiDGND, Roland Pomberger, Alexia Tischberger-Aldrian
URN:urn:nbn:de:bvb:384-opus4-1252633
Frontdoor URLhttps://opus.bibliothek.uni-augsburg.de/opus4/125263
ISSN:0921-3449OPAC
Parent Title (English):Resources, Conservation and Recycling
Publisher:Elsevier BV
Place of publication:Amsterdam
Type:Article
Language:English
Year of first Publication:2026
Publishing Institution:Universität Augsburg
Release Date:2025/09/15
Volume:224
First Page:108570
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108570
Institutes:Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlich-Technische Fakultät
Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlich-Technische Fakultät / Institut für Materials Resource Management
Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlich-Technische Fakultät / Institut für Materials Resource Management / Lehrstuhl für Resource and Chemical Engineering
Dewey Decimal Classification:6 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften / 62 Ingenieurwissenschaften / 620 Ingenieurwissenschaften und zugeordnete Tätigkeiten
Licence (German):CC-BY 4.0: Creative Commons: Namensnennung (mit Print on Demand)